Thanks for the explanation, but even a "wall" can usually be circumvented by 
bikes and pedestrians, and will be if doing so is shorter than going the 
official way.

------------
Patrick Lenon

From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
CC: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; 
[email protected]; [email protected]
Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2011 20:57:15 -0500
Subject: RE: [Bikies] RR public hearings 610 N Whitney Way 9/27-28 RE closing 
Blount, Livingston, and Brearly Streets










I understand from previous conversations with WSOR and OCR officials that 
physical barriers would be installed to prevent peds and bikes from crossing at 
intersections, not just cars. That's why I
 called it a "wall" in the Isthmus article.
 
We asked for the hearings to be held on the east side the last time hearings 
were scheduled. That was before high speed rail came and interrupted planning 
for Central Park and everything was put on hold. We got resistance
 but I agree we should ask again. I copied Curt on this.
 
Marsha


From: [email protected] [[email protected]] On 
Behalf Of Patrick Lenon [[email protected]]

Sent: Thursday, July 14, 2011 3:23 PM

To: [email protected]; Phillips, Rob

Cc: Mayor; [email protected]; Morton, Marianne

Subject: Re: [Bikies] RR public hearings 610 N Whitney Way 9/27-28 RE closing 
Blount, Livingston, and Brearly Streets






Echoing Charles' thoughts and adding a few:



As a frequent Isthmus-crosser by both bike and car, I have to ask how "closed" 
these streets will be.  Even if cars are blocked, there may be significant foot 
and bike traffic going through these intersections.  During the school year 
this includes hundreds
 of kids going to and from Marquette/O'Keefe.  If the trains start coming 
through these intersections without horns, I see great potential danger here.



Also, when the primary isthmus-crossing arteries like Baldwin are blocked for 
construction or whatever, their traffic can be offloaded to these other 
streets.  We would lose that option.



I would greatly prefer that they install gates and lights and keep the streets 
open.



------------ Patrick Lenon





Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2011 14:46:57 -0500

From: [email protected]

To: [email protected]

Subject: [Bikies] RR public hearings 610 N Whitney Way 9/27-28 RE closing 
Blount, Livingston, and Brearly Streets



_____________________________________________

From: STRAWSER, Charles

Sent: Thursday, July 14, 2011 2:33 PM

To: Rummel, Marsha; '[email protected]'

Cc: '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'

Subject: RR public hearings 9/27-28 RE closing Blount, Livingston,
 and Brearly Streets
Hi Marsha and Rob,
I was glad to see your comments here:
http://www.isthmus.com/isthmus/article.php?article=34086
I realize it’s a long shot, but perhaps the two of you and/or Mayor Soglin 
could ask the Railroad Commission to hold this meeting, oh, somewhere near the 
streets the RR is proposing to close.
Closing the streets obviously affects everyone whether they drive, walk, or 
bike. But holding the meeting on the other side of town (610 N Whitney Way) 
disproportionately affects those people who cross
 the tracks on foot or by bicycle since they may not even be able to attend the 
meeting and have their voice heard.
I’m sure that there is space available somewhere nearby. MG&E, CommonWealth 
Development’s Madison Enterprise Center at Baldwin and East Washington seem 
like likel.
I bet Curt Brink would be happy to host the meeting at the Brink Lounge or High 
Noon Saloon, since closing Blount and Livingston effectively cuts access to his 
buildings off for half the population
 of the isthmus. Anyone have his email address?

Thanks,
Chuck



_______________________________________________ Bikies mailing list 
[email protected] 
http://lists.danenet.org/listinfo.cgi/bikies-danenet.org

                                          
_______________________________________________
Bikies mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.danenet.org/listinfo.cgi/bikies-danenet.org

Reply via email to