I like that reflectors don't run out of batteries. On Aug 19, 2011 12:02 PM, "Robbie Webber" <[email protected]> wrote: > Sometimes the reflector falls off or is removed to mount a rear light. Other > bikes - especially high end or hand built bikes - may not have a rear > reflector. Instead of risking the police being nit-picky about whether > someone with a very bright, flashing red light - i.e. someone who is highly > visible at night - actually has the required rear reflector, it would be > best if the law allowed a light instead of a reflector. > > Madison cops aren't going to be rigid about this, but you never know > elseswhere. Not all police officers around the state use as much common > sense in enforcing laws with regard to bicyles and bicyclists. > > > Robbie Webber > > On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 11:18 AM, [email protected] > <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Of course someone bicycling at night should use lights (front and >> preferably also rear), but why would you want to drop the additiona >> visibility benefit of a reflector? Unless I am missing some completely >> different reason for a change, I hope BFW will re-consider the inclusion of >> this item on its agenda and just leave that existing requirement in place. >> >>
_______________________________________________ Bikies mailing list [email protected] http://lists.danenet.org/listinfo.cgi/bikies-danenet.org
