Frankly, I would be more concerned if we were able to actually move along some of the bike projects that are already funded.
-----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Michael Rewey Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2011 12:46 PM To: 'bikies' Subject: Re: [Bikies] Progress Redefined: funding cuts and bans for bikes The Koch's probably vetoed that option already. - Even though gas is supposed to hit $4 by the end of the year (what does a couple of more cents for taxes really matter?) -------------------------------------------------- On 10 Nov 2011 at 11:59, Matt Logan wrote: And of course, simply raising the gas tax to cover the costs of maintaining the highway system seems to be off the table: http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/ezra-klein/post/gas-tax-aversion-is-tyin g-congress- in-knots/2011/11/08/gIQA5qrt1M_blog.html From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Dave Schlabowske Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2011 11:31 AM To: MILBTW; bikies Subject: [Bikies] Progress Redefined: funding cuts and bans for bikes See what the Senate is up to: http://www.bfw.org/2011/11/10/federal-bill-cuts-bike-funds-and-includes-ban- on- bicycles/ &nbs _______________________________________________ Bikies mailing list [email protected] http://lists.danenet.org/listinfo.cgi/bikies-danenet.org _______________________________________________ Bikies mailing list [email protected] http://lists.danenet.org/listinfo.cgi/bikies-danenet.org
