Matt, I don't think the distribution of your 35 bucks and/or mine is going to 
strike a heck of a lot of fear into the Koch Bros.' hearts.  (I know, big 
anatomical assumption there.)
I'd just as soon use my paltry funds to keep the Fed alive on life support 
until the atmosphere improves.  Not to mention that the conservatives might 
find it annoying, so there's entertainment value.

------------
Patrick Lenon

> From: [email protected]
> To: [email protected]; [email protected]
> Date: Sun, 27 May 2012 15:21:28 -0500
> CC: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [Bikies] Bikies Digest, Vol 43, Issue 26
> 
> “which for the current administration, we considered a win.”
> 
> And my key point is if all someone has to give is  $35 this year, it might
> be better spent on efforts to change the current administration rather than
> funding the BFW “win” of limiting the cuts to $3mil. (which I would note was
> done by pulling in federal funding, which is on shaky ground in the House). 
> But even with that win, I am not satisfied that the BFW invested its effort
> in the most productive course.   While Republicans criticize bicycling in
> general, I have heard they are a bit less resistant to bicycling programs
> for children, since this doesn’t violate their cultural identity.  In the
> recent MacIver screed against SRTS, they singled out walking, not bicycling.
> 
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=53V35ovZD-s
> 
> Has the BFW contacted the MacIver Institute to ask them what their issue is
> with funding for SRTS?  I’d love to see an article on just what their beef
> is and how it is grounded in principle.  The #1 cause of death for kids is
> motor vehicle crashes, so I would think such a stat could be used to argue
> that SRTS is just the kind of personal protection program even limited
> government types like Ayn Rand should support.
> 
> http://www.atlassociety.org/objectivist_politics
> 
> “In both civil and criminal realms, law functions by providing clear
> standards for determining which actions and interactions among people are
> consistent with individual rights”
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Bikies mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.danenet.org/listinfo.cgi/bikies-danenet.org
                                          
_______________________________________________
Bikies mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.danenet.org/listinfo.cgi/bikies-danenet.org

Reply via email to