Yes I have been informed that the Railroad project would cut off all
traffic not just motorized.  I would only support full closure if ped and
bike access was allowed or if only one street was closed but never two in a
row as that would make the time to circumvent them too long for most peds.
-Michael

On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 3:04 PM, <[email protected]> wrote:

> If I remember correctly, the discussion of closing Blount, Brearly, and
> Livingston didn't make any accommodation for non-motorized vehicles or
> pedestrians to use the crossings after the closing.  In other words, the
> grid would have been shut down there.
>
> I would absolutely support closing the motor vehicle crossings of the path
> and garden between Dunning and Waubesa, but not eliminating
> pedestrian/non-motor vehicle crossings there, and if we compare this to
> the Blount/Brearly/Livingston project, there is a hazard of confusion on
> this matter.
>
> Thank you,
> Mindy Preston
>
> > I think its a great idea and as a resident of the district this is in
> > would
> > fully support it.
> > The map you created does a great job of showing how inferior the east
> side
> > path is to the west side.  Much of the reason is of course historical
> > street and railroad configurations but that should not get in the way of
> > progress and making paths safer for all and getting through traffic on
> > major streets rather than neighborhood ones.
> >
> > A while ago the city and the railroad were having discussions about
> > closing
> > Blount, Brearly and Livingston to through traffic.  I thought that would
> > be
> > a great idea and it would make that section of the path easier but the
> > city
> > did not approve and had some issues with how it would affect the soon to
> > be
> > Central park.  I never take the path from John Nolen to the Yahara
> instead
> > I opt for Jennifer st as there are only a couple stops and the narrow ped
> > bridge to deal with to get back onto the path along Eastwood.  It would
> be
> > interesting to get a bike count of traffic on the path, Jennifer and
> > Spaight (perhaps Willy and Rutledge to see what bikers prefer to take to
> > the intersection of Willy and John Nolen.
> >
> http://host.madison.com/wsj/news/local/govt-and-politics/railroad-company-at-odds-with-city-over-proposal-to-close/article_1e005fa4-43ad-11e1-a18c-0019bb2963f4.html
> >
> http://host.madison.com/ct/news/local/grassroots/grass-roots-will-rail-crossing-dispute-send-central-park-plan/article_51dbebd2-6576-11e1-ade7-001871e3ce6c.html
> >
> > -Michael
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 10:17 AM, Grant Foster <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >
> >> I'm not sure about the pushback from local residents. I used to live at
> >> Jackson/St. Paul and I would have supported closing it. Having to drive
> >> an
> >> extra three blocks to access Bashford/Dunning or St. Paul/Waubesa is
> >> pretty
> >> minimal for eliminating the through traffic on St. Paul.
> >>
> >> Now I live in Eastmorland and our access to Atwood/Cottage Grove Rd is
> >> totally sufficient with Dempsey and Dennett/Walter as the bookends. It's
> >> actually a longer stretch with no through access to the south. I live
> >> close
> >> to Dempsey and I'd much rather have increased traffic there than through
> >> the middle of the neighborhood.
> >>
> >>
> >> The frequent road crossings really are problematic from my perspective.
> >> I
> >> commute through every day, so obviously that shapes my perception. They
> >> are
> >> quite uncomfortable and really interrupt the journey. In the winter each
> >> of
> >> these crossings becomes even tougher when the snow is plowed in front of
> >> them.
> >>
> >> Now that my oldest is riding on his own, they actually feel very
> >> threatening as well. At the end of the day, I just think there is so
> >> little
> >> value for motor vehicles to cross through and so much value for
> >> bikers/bladers/peds/gardners/kids. It'd be interesting to compare
> >> bike/ped
> >> volume on this path vs. mv traffic on these road segments.
> >>
> >> I pulled a map together to highlight the difference between the CC and
> >> SW
> >> path road crossings. This isn't news to anyone on this listserv, but
> >> it's
> >> powerful to see it graphically. I chose two sections of equivalent
> >> length
> >> from downtown out.
> >>
> >>
> https://maps.google.com/maps/ms?msid=214427577550430265882.0004c1f6e282e4f5b3fe2&msa=0&ll=43.0576,-89.372749&spn=0.102976,0.154324
> >>
> >> I've contacted Marsha to get her thoughts.
> >>
> >> Grant
> >>
> >> On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 8:51 AM, Michael Chronister <
> >> [email protected]> wrote:
> >>
> >>> This is an interesting idea but I imagine a lot of push back from the
> >>> people who live right off of St Paul and as you mention the users of St
> >>> Bernards church.  What seems weird to me is that St paul does not
> >>> connect
> >>> to Atwood or Dunning.  If it did then you could close all three of the
> >>> streets you mention and there would be no problem with access to St.
> >>> Paul
> >>> and the residences off them.  I do see quite a few bikers taking St.
> >>> Paul
> >>> instead of the path to get from Waubesa to Jackson.  I have tried it
> >>> and it
> >>> is easier as you have no streets to cross and you get the right of way
> >>> the
> >>> entire length of St. Paul.
> >>>
> >>> I would suggest a quick email to Alder Marsha Rummel (
> >>> [email protected]) about this idea and also start to get
> >>> other
> >>> interested parties to pledge support for this idea.  I know the city is
> >>> going to do some work on the Dunning-Atwood intersection for bikes so
> >>> perhaps this idea would fit into that design process.
> >>> Check the bottom of this page, no info but it does mention a bike
> >>> signal
> >>> at this intersection.
> >>> http://www.cityofmadison.com/bikeMadison/planning/proposed/
> >>> Also the entire length of Atwood from Rusk to Fair Oaks is set to be
> >>> redone in 2016 so there is another opportunity to make path
> >>> improvements.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> -Michael
> >>>
> >>> On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 12:40 PM, Grant Foster <[email protected]>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> So I was thinking about the Capital City Trail on my morning commute
> >>>> and
> >>>> wondered why we haven't closed some of the through streets in this
> >>>> section:
> >>>> Jackson, Ohio and Corry. It seems to me that they add very little
> >>>> value for
> >>>> MV traffic flow and are a significant obstacle to bike and ped traffic
> >>>> along the path.
> >>>>
> >>>> Then a friend posted this blog entry
> >>>>
> http://www.giveplantsachance.com/2010/05/atwood-community-garden-madison-wi.html
> >>>> and
> >>>> I thought how much value closing some or all of these connections
> >>>> would
> >>>> bring to this already great spot. Restriciting through traffic to foot
> >>>> and
> >>>> bike would increase the comfort and safety of the path itself and
> >>>> would
> >>>> enhance the space and its use as a community garden. The reclaimed
> >>>> space
> >>>> could be converted to addt'l garden plots or micro parks within the
> >>>> gardens
> >>>> (a spot for a picnic or the like).
> >>>>
> >>>> It's hard to imagine a lot of push back from local businesses along
> >>>> that
> >>>> stretch (Absolutely Art, Zoma, Rev. Cycles, the Ohio). The only major
> >>>> consideration might be for St. Bernard traffic. Even closing two of
> >>>> the
> >>>> three would be a huge step forward. I would think the neighborhood
> >>>> would
> >>>> also be generally supportive since it would reduce cut through traffic
> >>>> along St. Paul and make the whole stretch very safe and kid friendly.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> How does something like this get considered? What's the best approach
> >>>> to
> >>>> talk about it with the city?
> >>>>
> >>>> Grant
> >>>>
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> Bikies mailing list
> >>>> [email protected]
> >>>> http://lists.danenet.org/listinfo.cgi/bikies-danenet.org
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Bikies mailing list
> >> [email protected]
> >> http://lists.danenet.org/listinfo.cgi/bikies-danenet.org
> >>
> >>
> > _______________________________________________
> > Bikies mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://lists.danenet.org/listinfo.cgi/bikies-danenet.org
> >
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
Bikies mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.danenet.org/listinfo.cgi/bikies-danenet.org

Reply via email to