If anyone wants the play-by-play, final vote roll call, and stated or implied reasons for voting one way or the other, let me know. I'm way too tired to deal with it tonight, and in general am glad it's over, but I can share insights - maybe off line, to not stir things up again - if you are still curious.
Just a quick note. There was a motion to refer - that is not vote on yet - until June. Some alders thought they could work on the proposal and get more people on board, find a better lighting solution, or ??? That motion was voted down. I think many alders just wanted it done with or thought nothing of substance would change between now and June. Then the final vote to approve the lighting was 12-7 (one absent.) There was lots more in between, but that's the short version. Robbie Webber Transportation Policy Analyst State Smart Transportation Initiative www.ssti.us 608-263-9984 (o) [email protected] On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 11:30 PM, Mark Clear <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Bikies mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.danenet.org/listinfo.cgi/bikies-danenet.org > >
_______________________________________________ Bikies mailing list [email protected] http://lists.danenet.org/listinfo.cgi/bikies-danenet.org
