Thanks Robbie! I had meant to write something very similar to your comment
and now just replied to yours on the blog. This victim-blaming crap from
the Bike Fed has to stop.

 Harald.

On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 2:09 PM Matthew Logan <[email protected]> wrote:

> I have come to realize that most law enforcement accounts of crashes
> basically come right off the MV4000 form:
> http://wisconsindot.gov/Documents/dmv/shared/manual-mv4000.pdf
>
> My understanding is that this form’s purpose is not to inform the general
> public, but to be used as a tool by transportation officials to help
> improve the safety of the transportation system.  So knowing that few
> bicyclists wear reflective clothing in an area is a useful clue for traffic
> engineers who are evaluating different improvements in a corridor, but it
> often reads to the general public as if bicyclists are being blamed.
>
> I have tried to clue in local news organizations to this issue, but they
> really don’t have the staff to write real stories any more – they basically
> take whatever an official gives them and that is what gets published.
>
> As far as a solution:  it sure would be nice if there was some guidance
> for law enforcement on how to craft a news release, since that release has
> become the defacto story text in so many crashes.
>
> =Matt
>
>
>
> *From:* Bikies [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Robbie
> Webber
> *Sent:* Friday, September 18, 2015 1:57 PM
> *To:* Bikies
> *Subject:* [Bikies] 13th person in Wisconsin killed on a bike this year
>
>
>
> OK, I admit that I just unloaded on the Bike Fed blog
> <http://www.bfw.org/2015/09/17/crash-in-vilas-county-raises-bike-fatalities-to-13-for-the-year/>
> about this most recent death. I will own that. But I am very frustrated by
> seeing so many news reports about pedestrians and bicyclists being killed
> on the roads this year.
>
>
>
> And the news reports -- even by Bike Fed, of all sources -- always seem to
> focus on what the victim did wrong. In this case, no lights and no
> reflective clothing.
>
>
>
> I just finished reading a blog post about "walk-shaming
> <http://streets.mn/2015/09/16/walk-shaming-in-the-media/>," and it
> resonated with me.
>
>
>
> Since my comments are "awaiting moderation," and I'm impatient (some might
> say hot-tempered), here are my comments:
>
>
>
> If you go to streetview, you can see that the road has shoulders in the
> location. Assuming that the bicyclist was riding on the shoulder — and I
> have to assume that any bicyclist out in the evening on a rural road would
> be on the shoulder — why are we focusing so much on the fact that he didn’t
> have lights or reflective clothing? Isn’t that a bit of blaming the victim?
>
> Of course, both legally and practically, one should use lights,
> reflectors/flashers, and/or reflective clothing at night. But there is
> always another party involved. What about the driver? Geez, I’m worried
> about hitting a DEER at night. Shouldn’t the driver be aware of what’s
> around him?
>
> If indeed the bicyclist was on the shoulder, the driver would have to have
> left the travel lane to hit the guy. I realize that Share and Be Aware is
> focused on keeping bicyclists safe, but where is the outrage that drivers
> are not paying attention?
>
> And maybe we should also be looking at why people have no choice but to
> travel on these roads. What about infrastructure? Isn’t it a great thing
> that people are using their bikes to get around? Do they have a safe route
> when they chose a bike?
>
> Unfortunately, we do not have the victim’s side of the story, so we will
> maybe never know why he was out there and whether he was on the shoulder.
> I’m sure the driver will never even get a ticket because the bicyclist
> didn’t have lights. Leave your lane = oopsie. No lights = death penalty.
>
> - See more at:
> http://www.bfw.org/2015/09/17/crash-in-vilas-county-raises-bike-fatalities-to-13-for-the-year/#sthash.AaJWCTH4.dpuf
>
>
>
>
> Robbie Webber
> Transportation Policy Analyst
> 608-263-9984 (o)
>
> 608-225-0002 (c)
>
> [email protected]
>
> All opinions expressed are my own and do not necessarily reflect those of
> my employer or any other group with which I am affiliated.
> _______________________________________________
> Bikies mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.danenet.org/listinfo.cgi/bikies-danenet.org
>
_______________________________________________
Bikies mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.danenet.org/listinfo.cgi/bikies-danenet.org

Reply via email to