Brian and I exhanged emails off-list, and then he agreed that it was worth 
sharing that exchange to the list. It’s copied below.
chuck


From: Chuck Strawser
Sent: Friday, July 08, 2016 10:35 AM
To: 'Brian Mink'
Subject: RE: [Bikies] NYTimes/Gretchen Reynolds: The Surprising Health Benefits 
of an Electric Bike

Brian,

There are also already state rules in place that define “motor bicycles” as 
those going less than 20mph, and even those are not allowed to be used on bike 
paths *under power* (you can pedal them unassisted on paths). See state statute 
below, and also the useful page from the city’s website.

So the trike that passed you at 35mph was already in violation of the rules, 
and does not meet the state definition of a “motor bicycle” (and is therefore 
not legal on streets, either).

But like every other law, it’s meaningless unless it’s enforced.
Look at the posted speed limits (for motor vehicles). How many people are 
ticketed for driving 40mph on the sections of University Ave that are signed 
25mph?

Since you replied to me only, I won’t post this on the list-serv without asking 
you. I think it’s relevant to the discussion, so you might consider posting it 
(and my response) yourself.

State Statute 340.01(30) defines a “motor bicycle”:
http://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov/statutes/statutes/340.pdf
340.01(30) "Motor bicycle" means any of the following:
(a) A bicycle to which a power unit not an integral part of the vehicle has 
been added to permit the vehicle to travel at a speed of not more than 30 miles 
per hour with a 150-pound rider on a dry, level, hard surface with no wind and 
having a seat for the operator.
(b) A 2-wheeled or 3-wheeled vehicle that has fully operative pedals for 
propulsion by human power and an electric motor of less than 750 watts and that 
is capable, when powered solely by the motor, of a maximum speed of less than 
20 miles per hour with a 170-pound rider on a dry, level, hard surface with no 
wind.

Here’s a useful page from the city’s website. Although this page makes no 
mention of bikes with something other than an electric motor, all the 
prohibitions on using an electric bicycle also apply to motor bicycles with gas 
engines.
http://www.cityofmadison.com/trafficEngineering/documents/ElecBikeLawsWeb20130520v.pdf

Chuck Strawser
Pedestrian & Bicycle Transportation Planner
Commuter Solutions
UW-Madison Transportation Services

Please note that my email address has changed. My new email is 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>

Visit our University Bicycle Resource Center at Helen C White: 
http://transportation.wisc.edu/transportation/bike_annex.aspx

How are we doing? Take our customer satisfaction survey at 
https://www.surveymonkey.com/s/CommSol_CSSurvey



From: Brian Mink [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, July 08, 2016 10:22 AM
To: Chuck Strawser
Subject: Re: [Bikies] NYTimes/Gretchen Reynolds: The Surprising Health Benefits 
of an Electric Bike

Thanks Chuck. Many jurisdictions go beyond the simple rule that Madison has 
posted on bike trails by restricting maximum speed. Some of the electric hub 
motors are quite capable of reaching 35 miles per hour. I was passed by a high 
end trike last week that was probably doing 30 mph outfitted with the most 
powerful BionX hub motor. Madison's common courtesy and common sense "Yield to 
slower users" is a nice start but I think Madison will likely have to deal with 
an overall speed limit on bike trails, eventually.

Brian Mink

Chuck Strawser via Bikies<mailto:[email protected]>
July 8, 2016 at 10:14 AM
Brian Mink said: "I've noticed that most west coast cities that allow electric 
bikes do have rules that include behaving in regard to maximum speed, passing, 
remaining non aggressive and the like. Should Madison have such rules and post 
them? Probably."

Madison already has rules, and does post them. They are on all the wayfinding 
signs along bike paths all around town, and among those rules is this one:
"Faster {path] users yield to slower users"

Which gets to the crux of the issue - how someone operates their vehicle is 
often as important (or more important) to the safety of others than exactly 
what kind of vehicle it is.



Chuck Strawser
Pedestrian & Bicycle Transportation Planner
Commuter Solutions
UW-Madison Transportation Services

Please note that my email address has changed. My new email is 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]><mailto:[email protected]><mailto:[email protected]>

Visit our University Bicycle Resource Center at Helen C White: 
http://transportation.wisc.edu/transportation/bike_annex.aspx

How are we doing? Take our customer satisfaction survey at 
https://www.surveymonkey.com/s/CommSol_CSSurvey




From: Bikies [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Brian Mink 
via Bikies
Sent: Friday, July 08, 2016 9:59 AM
To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Cc: Scott Morris Rose; Bikies
Subject: Re: [Bikies] NYTimes/Gretchen Reynolds: The Surprising Health Benefits 
of an Electric Bike

I happen to know folks who due to one arthritic malady or less than optimal 
joint replacement surgery have opted for electric assist bikes or wheels with 
hub motors.

I also have taken note of many more cyclists of larger habitus using electric 
assist bikes. Then there are a whole bunch or cargo/kid hauler electric assist 
bikes on trails around town.

I think they are a good thing. Most of us able bodied, hard core enthusiasts 
will put off or scorn the thought of using electric assist. Let's assume that 
most folks who use electric assist do so based on some need that we probably 
don't know about. Many work places don't have showers. Electric assist one 
could image, can keep one below the gushing sweat threshold on the morning 
commute.

I've noticed that most west coast cities that allow electric bikes do have 
rules that include behaving in regard to maximum speed, passing, remaining non 
aggressive and the like. Should Madison have such rules and post them? Probably.

Bottom line is: even the heartiest of urban cyclists might age into the need 
for an electric assist bicycle at some point and then we'll look back on our 
years of scorn and finally come to the conclusion that we were not being 
understanding, nice or fair.

Brian Mink
Monona


via Bikies<mailto:[email protected]><mailto:[email protected]>
July 8, 2016 at 9:45 AM

If that what it takes to get these sedentary brutes onto a bike, then let

them ride their electric bikes on roads and not on bike paths.

....

Admittedly, my n is pretty small, but I resent these lazy assholes being

on the bike paths. And it's bogus to say these are for sedentary folks.

> By far, the most people who use them will be former bicyclists.



I personally could not see myself wanting one. (Years ago I tried one when

someone from MGE was demo-ing one at some event and I wasn't impressed.)

But I also don't get all the hostility about them. I don't see how

discourteous/unsafe passing is any more or less obnoxious by someone on an

electric-assist bike than it is by someone on a traditional bike who

thinks he's doing Tour de France. A moron on an electric-assist bike is

not inherently worse or more dangerous than a moron in Spandex<tm>.



As for the opinion that most people using them will be former bicyclists,

so what? If it helps keep on a bike someone who has diminished physical

capability, what's wrong with that?



_______________________________________________

Bikies mailing list

[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]><mailto:[email protected]><mailto:[email protected]>

http://lists.danenet.org/listinfo.cgi/bikies-danenet.org

--
Sent from 
Postbox<https://www.postbox-inc.com/?utm_source=email&utm_medium=siglink&utm_campaign=reach><https://www.postbox-inc.com/?utm_source=email&utm_medium=siglink&utm_campaign=reach>
_______________________________________________
Bikies mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
http://lists.danenet.org/listinfo.cgi/bikies-danenet.org
Brian Mink<mailto:[email protected]>
July 8, 2016 at 9:58 AM
I happen to know folks who due to one arthritic malady or less than optimal 
joint replacement surgery have opted for electric assist bikes or wheels with 
hub motors.

I also have taken note of many more cyclists of larger habitus using electric 
assist bikes. Then there are a whole bunch or cargo/kid hauler electric assist 
bikes on trails around town.

I think they are a good thing. Most of us able bodied, hard core enthusiasts 
will put off or scorn the thought of using electric assist. Let's assume that 
most folks who use electric assist do so based on some need that we probably 
don't know about. Many work places don't have showers. Electric assist one 
could image, can keep one below the gushing sweat threshold on the morning 
commute.

I've noticed that most west coast cities that allow electric bikes do have 
rules that include behaving in regard to maximum speed, passing, remaining non 
aggressive and the like. Should Madison have such rules and post them? Probably.

Bottom line is: even the heartiest of urban cyclists might age into the need 
for an electric assist bicycle at some point and then we'll look back on our 
years of scorn and finally come to the conclusion that we were not being 
understanding, nice or fair.

Brian Mink
Monona
via Bikies<mailto:[email protected]>
July 8, 2016 at 9:45 AM

If that what it takes to get these sedentary brutes onto a bike, then let

them ride their electric bikes on roads and not on bike paths.

....

Admittedly, my n is pretty small, but I resent these lazy assholes being

on the bike paths.  And it's bogus to say these are for sedentary folks.

 > By far, the most people who use them will be former bicyclists.



I personally could not see myself wanting one. (Years ago I tried one when

someone from MGE was demo-ing one at some event and I wasn't impressed.)

But I also don't get all the hostility about them. I don't see how

discourteous/unsafe passing is any more or less obnoxious by someone on an

electric-assist bike than it is by someone on a traditional bike who

thinks he's doing Tour de France.  A moron on an electric-assist bike is

not inherently worse or more dangerous than a moron in Spandex<tm>.



As for the opinion that most people using them will be former bicyclists,

so what?  If it helps keep on a bike someone who has diminished physical

capability, what's wrong with that?



_______________________________________________

Bikies mailing list

[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>

http://lists.danenet.org/listinfo.cgi/bikies-danenet.org

--
Sent from 
Postbox<https://www.postbox-inc.com/?utm_source=email&utm_medium=siglink&utm_campaign=reach>
_______________________________________________
Bikies mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.danenet.org/listinfo.cgi/bikies-danenet.org

Reply via email to