I understand the appeal of the dockless system for both cities (no major infrastructure to site in the right of way) and the occasional user (no membership fees.) But for someone who is planning on using the system on a regular basis, the per-hour charge can get pricey fast.
Let's say you take the train into the city and want to use the bike for the last-mile leg (which might be shorter or longer than one mile.) That's $1 in the AM and $1 in the PM. You also want to use the bike to either have lunch or run an errand midday. That's another $2 for the midday trip. Finally, you are going out to dinner or happy hour with friends. That's at least $1 more if you assume the final trip back to your train is covered as part of your normal PM commute. So that's $5/day for an average day. If you are running a bunch of errands or have several meetings during the day, it could be more. Sure, you might be able to just keep a bike in the city to use, but then you can't get a ride home from your friend or call a taxi/Uber if the weather changes. One of the nice things about bike sharing is that you can leave the bike and walk away -- no need to worry about locking it up or returning it to the same spot to use the next day. With a standard bike-sharing system, you pay a flat price and use the bike whenever you want. If you keep your one-way trips under 1/2 hour (one hour in some locations) there is no further charge to use the bikes in the system. Dockless seems to favor the occasional user, standard dock system with flat rate seems to favor the power user. Sort of like having a monthly pass on transit. Robbie Webber Transportation geek All opinions are my own, and not necessarily those of any group or organization with which I am affiliated. Founding member, Madison Bikes <http://www.madisonbikes.org/> *...where anyone can ride a bicycle conveniently and comfortably to any place year round.* MadisonBikes.org <http://www.madisonbikes.org/> Follow Madison Bikes on Facebook <https://www.facebook.com/groups/MBIIC/> On Sun, Jul 30, 2017 at 8:31 PM, Scott Morris Rose via Bikies < [email protected]> wrote: > I was a founding member of Seattle's "Pronto!" bike share program - a > conventional system with docks - but it lost a lot of money and the city, > which subsidized it, put a fork in it after briefly considering replacing > it with a different subsidized system with electric-assist bikes. From the > ashes of that subsidized system have arisen two competing unsubsidized > systems - Lime and Spin - which both use a dockless model. The way that > works is that the bikes have wheel locks that are unlocked when the bike is > rented. Locking the wheel lock ends the rental. There are some trade-offs > between the models, which mostly in my view skew in favor of the dockless > systems. > > With a dockless system, there is never the problem that a user will arrive > at the dock closest to their destination only to find that they can't end > the rental due to a full dock. There is also never the problem that the > dock is further from the user's destination (as long as the destination is > in the service area, which is the Seattle city limits for both systems) > that they have a substantial hike to that destination - users park the bike > wherever they can find empty sidewalk. There is no concept of membership - > users install an app and pay only for each of the rides they take - both > systems at $1/.5h. (There is also no escalating charge for longer rentals - > each .5h segment is $1.) That lowers the barrier to entry for visitors, who > only need to install and configure an app on their phones. > > On the downside, there is nothing to keep a malevolent passerby from > chucking a bike into the Ship Canal, as the bikes aren't tethered to a dock > or anything else between rentals. How substantial a problem that is, only > time will tell, but evidently it has been a problem with the similar system > in Manchester, and is a problem in Mountain View with Google's free bikes. > First time I saw a dockless share system was several years ago in Kyoto, > and I suspect they have very little problem there with vandalism, because > Japan. > > I had a chance to see the systems in action during my Seattle trip this > weekend, and I've attached photos of the bikes, which I didn't try as I had > my own bike with me. I did install the Spin app, and it's simple both to > configure and to use. Bikes of both systems were very prevalent in the > neighborhoods I rode in, mostly along the Ship Canal (U District, Fremont, > Ballard) and downtown. And people were riding them. > > Another issue is with helmets, use of which is required by law in King > County. Neither Lime nor Spin offer helmets with their bike or as a > distinct rental, while Pronto! provided them with each bike, along with a > presumably expensive scheme for cleaning them. That's going to lead to > rampant scofflaw behavior. Or, more accurately, continue rampant scofflaw > behavior - even many people on their own bikes ignore the law. > > -- > S. Rose > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Bikies mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.danenet.org/listinfo.cgi/bikies-danenet.org > >
_______________________________________________ Bikies mailing list [email protected] http://lists.danenet.org/listinfo.cgi/bikies-danenet.org
