On Fri, 6 Feb 2004, Dean Hall wrote: >>>[envdir instead of bincimap.conf] >> That's an interesting opinion, and it's something we could consider for >> 1.3. :-) >I agree with Henry. Are you still considering this for a major release?
I haven't really planned a 2.0 yet :-). No, just kidding. Yes in 1.3 we will most likely not have bincimap.conf in its current state, but rather have configuration act through a shell script. This hasn't really been discussed properly yet, but something in the order of ALLOW_PLAIN="yes" DEPOT="IMAPdir" CA_PATH="/etc/ssl/certs/" Just clean and simple, and with as few options as possible, that's my philosophy. I'm hoping we can get this nice and tidy with an envdir-like approach. Andy :-) -- Andreas Aardal Hanssen | http://www.andreas.hanssen.name/gpg Author of Binc IMAP | "It is better not to do something http://www.bincimap.org/ | than to do it poorly."
