On Tue, 2004-02-17 at 17:23, Jeremy Kitchen wrote: > I was just wondering what the pros/cons are, if any, of using bincimap's > built in ssl over something like ucspi-ssl. Personally, I'd rather have > it seperated off into something like ucspi-ssl, but if there was > something I should be worried about I'm surely willing to listen to what > you all have to say :)
to answer my own question: one thing I can think of that could potentially be better about using sslserver instead of tcpserver + binc's ssl, is that you can use recordio, or fixcrio still with the sslserver ;) I'm not trying to sway anyone from using binc's built in ssl stuff, just trying to stir up some conversation about this, get some opinions. -Jeremy -- Jeremy Kitchen Systems Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Kitchen @ #qmail on EFNet - Join the party! ..................... Inter7 Internet Technologies, Inc. www.inter7.com 866.528.3530 toll free 847.492.0470 int'l 847.492.0632 fax GNUPG key ID: 93BDD6CE
