I'm looking at different IMAP servers, and in my quest for information on Binc I ran into the following: http://www.thedjbway.org/imap/bincimap.html#performance .
Is anyone else seeing the same results or have improvements been made?
I'm working at Stockholm University Sweden and we are currently testing Binc to replace our current Courier-IMAP solution.
I've moved endless of thousend messages and the preformance is optimal every time. If it took him ~4minutes to move 165 mails in IMAP that just basicly does a rename on all 165 files he without a doubt has a broken system. I have not yet seen a more optimal, clean and scalable IMAP server then Binc. We are running AFS and thats make the demands on high preformance diskaccess code very importent.
-- Jerry Lundstr�m Sektionen f�r IT och media, Stockholms universitet +46 (0)8 16 19 99 / http://www.it.su.se
