Fr34k wrote: > isc.org > > http://www.isc.org/sw/bind/arm95/Bv9ARM-all.html > > [check-names ( master | slave | response ) > ( warn | fail | ignore ); ] > > This is for 9.5.x > Not sure what version you have, but now you have something to start from.
RH's 9.3 ... as I noted, I've looked at the docs, but they don't tell you what is filtered and what isn't and what the differences between wanr/fail/ignore are. The docs, as I noted, refer to RFC's 821, 952, and 1123, but those aren't specific about exactly what is "illegal" and, regardless, don't tell you what BIND considers "illegal". Some RFC apparently "legalized" underbars, but it's none of those three. -- Peter Laws / N5UWY National Weather Center / Network Operations Center University of Oklahoma Information Technology
