"Tony Toews [MVP]" <tto...@telusplanet.net> wrote:

>As far as I can tell from the same 5 or 20 IP addresses.  I haven't seen these 
>lines
>before.

When I analyzed todays log I got three IP address.

204.15.80.50 might be smtp9.soma.ironport.com
63.217.28.226 might be Network solutions according to the below SlashDot 
article.
76.9.16.171 is mentioned at http://isc.sans.org/diary.html?storyid=5713

Ah, I think I see what is happening here.  Searching at the below article for
63.217.28.226 
http://tech.slashdot.org/tech/09/01/24/0113210.shtml shows a reply stating:

"The problem seems to kick in for DNS servers that arent rejecting the queries.
Someone is channeling ye 'ole smurfing methods.

They're requesting a list of all DNS root servers. If the server don't reject 
the
query, a 17 byte query becomes a 50k response (or something like that) to the 
spoofed
address."

Tony
-- 
Tony Toews, Microsoft Access MVP
   Please respond only in the newsgroups so that others can 
read the entire thread of messages.
   Microsoft Access Links, Hints, Tips & Accounting Systems at 
http://www.granite.ab.ca/accsmstr.htm
   Tony's Microsoft Access Blog - http://msmvps.com/blogs/access/
_______________________________________________
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users

Reply via email to