In message <20090730141131.ga30...@nic.fr>, Stephane Bortzmeyer writes:
> On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 03:57:16PM +0200,
> JINMEI Tatuya / ???? <jin...@isc.org> wrote
> a message of 25 lines which said:
>
> > I personally don't see a need for it (what's wrong with -4/-6?)
>
> -4 shuts down any v6 service. We would like BIND to be able to *reply*
> to v6 queries without *generating* them. (For the record, I have the
> same issue than Gilles.)
Proper use of null routes will allow named to immediately detect
that a IPv6 site is not reachable. "default" is over used.
Mark
> _______________________________________________
> bind-users mailing list
> bind-users@lists.isc.org
> https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
--
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: ma...@isc.org
_______________________________________________
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
