On Nov 5 2009, joans4nz wrote:
Hi,
Thank you Mr Mark Andrews for your answer, and yes, I want help. I am sorry
about my first message, I repeat bellow, so I change all
CCC.BBB.AAA.in-addr.arpa's to my real numbers.
That certainly helps. Look at this:
$ dig +trace soa 224/28.66.6.190.in-addr.arpa.
; <<>> DiG 9.7.0b1 <<>> +trace soa 224/28.66.6.190.in-addr.arpa.
;; global options: +cmd
. 318331 IN NS F.ROOT-SERVERS.NET.
. 318331 IN NS M.ROOT-SERVERS.NET.
. 318331 IN NS J.ROOT-SERVERS.NET.
. 318331 IN NS E.ROOT-SERVERS.NET.
. 318331 IN NS B.ROOT-SERVERS.NET.
. 318331 IN NS A.ROOT-SERVERS.NET.
. 318331 IN NS K.ROOT-SERVERS.NET.
. 318331 IN NS D.ROOT-SERVERS.NET.
. 318331 IN NS G.ROOT-SERVERS.NET.
. 318331 IN NS C.ROOT-SERVERS.NET.
. 318331 IN NS H.ROOT-SERVERS.NET.
. 318331 IN NS L.ROOT-SERVERS.NET.
. 318331 IN NS I.ROOT-SERVERS.NET.
;; Received 376 bytes from 127.0.0.1#53(127.0.0.1) in 0 ms
190.in-addr.arpa. 86400 IN NS SEC3.APNIC.NET.
190.in-addr.arpa. 86400 IN NS NS3.AFRINIC.NET.
190.in-addr.arpa. 86400 IN NS NS2.LACNIC.NET.
190.in-addr.arpa. 86400 IN NS NS-SEC.RIPE.NET.
190.in-addr.arpa. 86400 IN NS NS2.DNS.BR.
190.in-addr.arpa. 86400 IN NS NS.LACNIC.NET.
190.in-addr.arpa. 86400 IN NS TINNIE.ARIN.NET.
;; Received 218 bytes from 192.228.79.201#53(B.ROOT-SERVERS.NET) in 175 ms
66.6.190.in-addr.arpa. 86400 IN NS ns1.etecsa.net.
66.6.190.in-addr.arpa. 86400 IN NS ns2.etecsa.net.
;; Received 92 bytes from 2001:dc0:1:0:4777::140#53(SEC3.APNIC.NET) in 312 ms
224/28.66.6.190.in-addr.arpa. 2000 IN NS
ns1.mincex.cu.66.6.190.in-addr.arpa.
224/28.66.6.190.in-addr.arpa. 2000 IN NS
ns2.mincex.cu.66.6.190.in-addr.arpa.
;; Received 92 bytes from 200.55.128.4#53(ns2.etecsa.net) in 676 ms
;; connection timed out; no servers could be reached
The delegation of 224/28.66.6.190.in-addr.arpa from 66.6.190.in-addr.arpa
has been mangled. It reports the authoritative nameservers for the subzone
as
ns1.mincex.cu.66.6.190.in-addr.arpa.
ns2.mincex.cu.66.6.190.in-addr.arpa.
(and of course they do not exist) whereas they are almost certainly
meant to be
ns1.mincex.cu.
ns2.mincex.cu.
Classic case of "leaving out the trailing dot".
But even if that were corrected, it turns out that ns1.mincex.cu and
ns2.mincex.cu have never heard of 224/28.66.6.190.in-addr.arpa. and
also have an entirely different version of 66.6.190.in-addr.arpa than
ns1.etecsa.net and ns2.etecsa.net do. You have a lot of errors to
correct.
--
Chris Thompson
Email: c...@cam.ac.uk
_______________________________________________
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users