On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 01:27:30PM +0200, Jukka Pakkanen <jukka.pakka...@qnet.fi> wrote a message of 94 lines which said:
> I just saw the same thing: There are no less than *four* CNAMEs to resolve to get to the result, while even two is discouraged. It is not suprising that it may fails with resolvers which limit the number of chained CNAME (to avoid endless loops). _______________________________________________ bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
