On Thu, Dec 03, 2009 at 10:42:38AM +0800, lipeng967 wrote: > when I read the RFC1035, I noticed the opcode defination in the DNS message > head . It said that when opcode = 1 the message did Inverse query . but in > the packet I capatured when I used nslookup to do inverse query ,the inverse > query packet use the opcode = 0 and the question segment with RR TYPE PTR. > Can someone explain this ? Am I wrong about understanding the inverse query > ? Thank a lot . >
Note that 6.4 (inverse queries) was optional, and read 3.5 (in-addr.arpa), which is about REVERSE (not inverse) DNS as it is used today. With some additions and changes: the RFCs are living documents. RFC 3425 obsolets inverse queries entirely: The IQUERY method of performing inverse DNS lookups, specified in RFC 1035, has not been generally implemented and has usually been operationally disabled where it has been implemented. Both reflect a general view in the community that the concept was unwise and that the widely-used alternate approach of using pointer (PTR) queries and reverse-mapping records is preferable. Consequently, this document deprecates the IQUERY operation, declaring it entirely obsolete. This document updates RFC 1035. -- /*********************************************************************\ ** ** Joe Yao j...@tux.org - Joseph S. D. Yao ** \*********************************************************************/ _______________________________________________ bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users