If you really do have such a small pipe (with your email address I assume Sweden. I didn't think Swedes even knew there were link types other than fibre ;) )then perhaps you're throttling it to the point where your NTP sync drops off. Options: Perhaps try some traffic shaping on the link. IXFR or any other bandwidth friendly alternative as suggested below or perhaps an internal NTP server.
On 7/07/10 4:17 PM, "Sven Eschenberg" <s...@whgl.uni-frankfurt.de> wrote: > Hi, > > The size of the zone should not be that much of a matter if you use > IFXR. Aside from that, did you ever consider using another mechanism for > synchronization, like rsync or lzmaing the zone and transferring it via > your protocol of choice? > Then again, why would one have a TLD coloc on a 256kbps line, that seems > very unreasonable. > > Regards > > -Sven > > > On Wed, 2010-07-07 at 14:58 +0200, Niklas Jakobsson wrote: >> Hello, >> >> On ons, 2010-07-07 at 14:41 +0200, Tom Schmitt wrote: >>> -------- Original-Nachricht -------- >>>> Datum: Wed, 07 Jul 2010 13:13:45 +0200 >>>> Von: Niklas Jakobsson <n...@autonomica.se> >>>> An: bind-us...@isc.org >>>> Betreff: bind says \'clocks are unsynchronized\' but they are not >>> >>>> Hello, >>>> >>>> I have some problems with our bind servers complaining that 'clocks are >>>> unsynchronized' when doing zone transfers with TSIG. The problem is the >>>> clocks are correct, synced with ntp and everything. >>> >>> Maybe one of the two servers doing the zone transfer is running in a chroot >>> where it has another time setting than the server itself? >>> >> >> Not running any chroot. >> >>> >>>> >>>> The problems seems to occur mostly on zone transfers that take a long >>>> time (ie. hours). >>>> >>> >>> HOURS?? >>> There is defnitly something wrong. I cannot imagine a zone so big or a >>> connection so slow that a zonetransfer could take hours. Or do you make a >>> axfr of the tld com. over a serial connection? ;-) >>> >>> >>> Tom. >>> >> >> Size of a tld that should not be named: 256947194 bytes >> Speed of connection to a site very far away: 256 kbit/s >> >> 256947194/(256*1000/8)/60/60 = 2.23 ~ little over 2 hours... >> >> /Nico >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> bind-users mailing list >> bind-users@lists.isc.org >> https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users > > > _______________________________________________ > bind-users mailing list > bind-users@lists.isc.org > https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users -- Kal Feher _______________________________________________ bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users