In message <201009010237.26909.scott.simp...@computer.org>, Scott Simpson write
s:
> On Tuesday 31 August 2010 21:44:15 Barry Margolin wrote:
> > Do the transfer sources match the match-clients options of the two
> > views? When a connection arrives, it's first associated with a view
> > using this option. Then when the request turns out to be a zone
> > transfer it further checks it against the allow-transfer option.
>
> That is the intellectual leap I was looking for. I added the lines
>
> view "internal {
> match-clients { !192.168.2.12; 192.168.2/24; };
> ...
> view "external" {
> match-clients { !192.168.2.1; any; };
>
> on the server and things worked swimmingly (I was missing the not clauses
> before). Danka schoen.
Don't forget notify source and to do the same sort of thing on the slave.
This is in the FAQ.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> bind-users mailing list
> bind-users@lists.isc.org
> https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
--
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: ma...@isc.org
_______________________________________________
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
