On 25.01.11 13:14, M. Meadows wrote: > From: "M. Meadows" <sun-g...@live.com> > Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2011 13:14:45 -0500 > Subject: RE: odd dig results for fqdn > To: d...@dotat.at > Cc: bind-users <bind-users@lists.isc.org> > > > Thank you Tony. > > I see a cname pointing to another cname in this output. Is that the invalid > cname?
> I thought that sort of record was discouraged but not against the rules. > When I do a query on these cnames I get answers that seem meaningful. > I wonder why this would cause the odd results we are seeing ... where dig on > fqdn fails until we do dig with +nssearch on the domain? > > ;; ANSWER SECTION: > > getaroomgetadeal.com. 7200 IN SOA ns1.slicehost.net. > > hostmaster.getaroomgetadeal.com. 2011010501 28800 7200 604800 3600 > > getaroomgetadeal.com. 3600 IN CNAME www.getaroom.com. CNAME cannot coexist with any other record, including SOA. That means, you can NOT CNAME a domain delegated from anywhere. you only could do it in .com domain, instead of delegating it anywhere, including NS records that are in .com for getaroomgetadeal.com. -- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address. Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu. Micro$oft random number generator: 0, 0, 0, 4.33e+67, 0, 0, 0... _______________________________________________ bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
