On Jun 3 2011, Carl Byington wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
dig ns.il any +trace
ns.il. 86400 IN CNAME relay.huji.ac.il.
il. 86400 IN NS ildns.huji.ac.il.
il. 86400 IN NS ns-il.ripe.net.
il. 86400 IN NS nse.ns.il.
il. 86400 IN NS dns8.denic.de.
il. 86400 IN NS nsd.ns.il.
il. 86400 IN NS sns-pb.isc.org.
il. 86400 IN NS lookup.iucc.ac.il.
il. 86400 IN NS nsb.ns.il.
;; Received 354 bytes from 192.5.4.1#53(192.5.4.1) in 44 ms
With that cname, how are NS records like nse.ns.il supposed to work? Am
I missing something, or is that just broken?
It's a CNAME, not a DNAME. The existence of the CNAME ns.il does not
affect the perfectly good A record for (e.g.) nse.ns.il in any way.
--
Chris Thompson
Email: c...@cam.ac.uk
_______________________________________________
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
