In message <4e7131a6.3000...@chrysler.com>, Kevin Darcy <k...@chrysler.com> wrote:
>Indeed. It should be noted that not only does the graphiteops.com name >break the "CNAME and other" rule, but it's a *self-referential* CNAME >(rdata = graphiteops.com), so if one tried to chase it, one could chase >infinitely. This is, presumably, what RFC 1034 calls a "CNAME loop"... Yes, it is MAJORLY snafued alright. That's what makes it such a good test case, e.g. for software that does resolution-like thingies. _______________________________________________ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
