You have a good point. That SOA MNAME is used in a very limited way,
and is not involved in DNS resolution, which is what i'm concerned
about. We are not using DDNS, so i could put any value in there.
However, i have some desire to make my SOA 'clean', meaning not
putting nonsense values in SOA records.
Thanks for the helpful tips!
Jonathan
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 11:51, Alan Clegg <a...@clegg.com> wrote:
> On 10/27/2011 11:02 AM, Jonathan Stewart wrote:
>
>> Also, is this normal/expected behaviour? How can i get ns0 (and the
>> others) to NOTIFY ns1 when the serial is incremented? Must i use an
>> explicit {also-notify} ?
>
> Yes, this is expected. Since NS1 is the "master" server (since it is in
> the SOA), it is not necessary for it to ever be notified.
>
> As Kevin noted, unless you are doing dynamic DNS, feel free to put
> something else into the SOA, or use "also-notify {};"
>
> AlanC
> --
> a...@clegg.com | acl...@infoblox.com
> 1.919.355.8851
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
> from this list
>
> bind-users mailing list
> bind-users@lists.isc.org
> https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
>
--
Jonathan
_______________________________________________
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
from this list
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
