In article <mailman.884.1326738053.68562.bind-us...@lists.isc.org>, Warren Kumari <war...@kumari.net> wrote:
> On Jan 13, 2012, at 2:30 PM, Barry Margolin wrote: > > > In article <mailman.826.1326465946.68562.bind-us...@lists.isc.org>, > > Simon <si...@bk.it.cx> wrote: > > > >> Hi, > >> > >> sure it is. > >> > >> Here a more detailed version: > >> http://www.zytrax.com/books/dns/ch9/rr.html > > > > RR usually results in roughly equal load balancing. He said he wants > > one of the addresses to get MORE traffic than the other. How do you > > propose he specify the ratios with BIND? > > One (icky) solution is to hand out more addresses for one server than the > other > > www.example.com IN A 192.168.1.1 > www.example.com IN A 192.168.1.2 > www.example.com IN A 192.168.1.3 > www.example.com IN A 192.168.2.1 > > Bind 192.168.1.[1-3] to server1 and 192.168.2.1 to server2. > > server1 should now get kinda roughly 3 time as much traffic as server2 > (depending on number of clients, phase of moon, flavor of ice-cream, etc). > Horrendously icky, waste of space, etc but Unless things have changed since I last checked this (many years ago), BIND ignores the duplicates. -- Barry Margolin Arlington, MA
_______________________________________________ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users