No arguments from me on that reality check. I'm just glad there is a
"Plan B" while waiting for vendors and/or corporate IT to attend to
these details.
------
Andris
On 6/11/2012 3:17 PM, Kevin Darcy wrote:
At the risk of exceeding my cynicism quota for the week, this is an
Active Directory client we're talking about: since when does Microsoft
listen to best-practice suggestions from *anyone*?
A more fruitful approach, in my experience, is to approach the owners of
the AD zone and have them limit the number of Domain Controllers that
auto-register in the zone. I don't know the details of how they do this,
but our Active Directory folks have managed to figure it out, when I
complained to them about all of the TCP retries they were incurring...
- Kevin
On 6/11/2012 5:54 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:
> Andris,
> you should also be pushing for proper multi-homed server
> support in those applications that are causing you problems (read
> just about all IP applications). This is relatively easy for TCP.
>
>
https://www.isc.org/community/blog/201101/how-to-connect-to-a-multi-homed-server-over-tcp
_______________________________________________
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
from this list
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
