In message <CABUciRkAPvEyFr1s5ygu8=kfxdflbjadauy4asb4w_kws5-...@mail.gmail.com> , Alexander Gurvitz writes: > Is there any practical difference between the following two: > > 1. > example.com. NS ns1.example.com. > example.com. NS ns2.example.com. > ns1.example.com. A 1.1.1.1 > ns2.example.com. A 1.1.1.2 > > 2. > example.com. NS ns.example.com. > ns.example.com. A 1.1.1.1 > ns.example.com. A 1.1.1.2
Yes. It makes fault isolation harder. > Is there any possible difference in the resolvers behavior ? > How bind9(10?) threats that ? > > If someone knows about not-bind DNS resolvers I'd be happy to know that too. > > Reason: We run a public DNS hosting. I think it would be more user-friendly > if once we add more nameservers, we would just add them as A records under > the same ns1/ns2, instead of advising each user to add ns3..nsX to their > parent zones. Add some AAAA address as well. > Thanks, > Alexander Gurvitz, > net-me.net > > --20cf3005141a4b8f6f04d5ec63b0 > Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > > <div dir=3D"ltr">Is there any practical difference between the following tw= > o:<div><br></div><div>1.</div><div><a href=3D"http://example.com";>example.c= > om</a>. NS <a href=3D"http://ns1.example.com";>ns1.example.com</a>.<br></div= > ><div style> > <div><div><a href=3D"http://example.com";>example.com</a>. NS <a href=3D"htt= > p://ns2.example.com">ns2.example.com</a>.</div></div><div style><div><a hre= > f=3D"http://ns1.example.com";>ns1.example.com</a>. A 1.1.1.1</div><div><div>= > <a href=3D"http://ns2.example.com";>ns2.example.com</a>. A 1.1.1.2</div> > </div><div><br></div><div>2.=A0</div><div><div><a href=3D"http://example.co= > m">example.com</a>. NS <a href=3D"http://ns.example.com";>ns.example.com</a>= > .<br></div><div><div><a href=3D"http://ns.example.com";>ns.example.com</a>. = > A 1.1.1.1<br> > </div><div><div><a href=3D"http://ns.example.com";>ns.example.com</a>. A 1.1= > .1.2</div></div></div></div><div><br></div><div style>Is there any possible= > difference in the resolvers behavior ?</div><div style>How bind9(10?) thre= > ats that ?</div> > <div style><br></div><div style>If someone knows about not-bind DNS resolve= > rs I'd be happy to know that too.</div><div style><br></div><div style>= > Reason: We run a public DNS hosting. I think it would be more user-friendly= > if once we add more nameservers, we would just add them as A records under= > the same ns1/ns2, instead of advising each user to add ns3..nsX to their p= > arent zones.</div> > <div style><br></div><div style>Thanks,</div><div style>Alexander Gurvitz,<= > /div><div style><a href=3D"http://net-me.net";>net-me.net</a></div><div styl= > e><br></div></div></div></div> > > --20cf3005141a4b8f6f04d5ec63b0-- > > --===============4239163784821251570== > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > MIME-Version: 1.0 > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > Content-Disposition: inline > > _______________________________________________ > Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe > from this list > > bind-users mailing list > bind-users@lists.isc.org > https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users > --===============4239163784821251570==-- -- Mark Andrews, ISC 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: ma...@isc.org _______________________________________________ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
