On Apr 4, 2013, at 12:07 PM, Phil Mayers <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 04/04/13 16:55, Carlos M. Martinez wrote: >> Thank you very much for all the bits, certainly very helpful. >> >> My problem is that this cycle of zone signing triggers zone number >> increases and generates dozens of NOTIFY messages and the corresponding >> zone transfers to all slaves within a short period of time, something >> which I believe is not very friendly to my gracious slave service >> providers. > > You might ask your secondary if they care. We secondary for some people, and > my view is that I don't care if they send me one NOTIFY a minute and I'm > constantly doing tiny IXFR - I just don't care, or see why it's a problem. > > But I know some people don't like it. We don't send NOTIFY to one of our > secondaries for this reason, and that copy of the zone lags by 0->refresh. > It's not a huge problem for me, so if you can tolerate it, "notify explicit" > might help. Another option you may be interested in is "notify-delay" - if you don't really need the notifies sent immediately. AlanC -- Alan Clegg | +1-919-355-8851 | [email protected] _______________________________________________ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list bind-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
