My apologies--sent mid-message!

I know that for the following record in example.com's zone file:

host.example.com.  IN CNAME otherhost

BIND will return:

host.example.com. <TTL> IN CNAME otherhost.example.com.

Is this behavior required anywhere in the RFCs, or would

host.example.com. <TTL> IN CNAME otherhost.

be equally valid from an RFC perspective?  Obviously this would also
pertain to NS, MX, SRV, PTR, etc. records.

John


On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 4:12 PM, John Miller <johnm...@brandeis.edu> wrote:

> Hey there folks,
>
> I know that for the following record in a zone file:
>
> host.example.com.
>
> --
> John Miller
> Systems Engineer
> Brandeis University
> johnm...@brandeis.edu
> (781) 736-4619
>
_______________________________________________
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe 
from this list

bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users

Reply via email to