Ryan Pavely
Net Access Corporation
http://www.nac.net/
On 7/22/2013 11:00 AM, Barry Margolin wrote:
In article <mailman.877.1374504592.20661.bind-us...@lists.isc.org>,
Ryan Pavely <para...@nac.net> wrote:
Ok. What am I doing wrong? As far as I know this has worked for years
and sometime, weeks, months, years, ago it stopped.
This is for doing > /24 (greater in cidr smaller in size)
Example: we have a /25 that we host... and another /25 we host.. so we
split it up into smaller files unless we own the entire/24
The config is loaded.
Rndc reload reports all is well.
But a lookup fails.
Help?
BIND 9.9.3-P1 on Linux
== included file in named.conf
zone "128/27.1.10.10.IN-ADDR.ARPA" {
type master;
file "/usr/named/rev/10.10.1.128.rev";
};
Do you also have a 1.10.10.in-addr.arpa zone, and does it have all the
necessary CNAME records pointing x.1.10.10.in-addr.arpa to
x.128/27.1.10.10.in-addr.arpa?
I do not. 10.10.1.128/27 is a RFC1918 sample. In a real-world example
I also have some ATT address space 12.44.51.192/27 or so.. They point it
to me.
If I host a partial class, in this case 10.10.x.x I need to have a
parent file that cnames?
Am I correct I would do something like the following...
$GENERATE 128-160 $ CNAME $.128/27.1.10.10.IN-ADDR.ARPA.
What about when the block is already cnamed -> pointed -> delegated to
my host from an external source?
I tested this. It appears to be true. Interesting.
So that would suggest any time any block > a /24 is hosted you must
actually host the parent zone, pointing to the larger cidr, and then
have your normal files for each cider in that block.
_______________________________________________
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
from this list
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
