On Sep 23, 2013, at 7:59 AM, Vernon Schryver <v...@rhyolite.com> wrote:
> From: Eliezer Croitoru <elie...@ngtech.co.il> > >> I was looking for something like that but I am sure a dynamic DB is >> needed for the task right? > > Large DNSBLs are not very dynamic, because they have relatively few > changes per day. From another perspective, with the popularity of > dynamically updating forward and reverse DNS zones as end-user IP > addresses changes, why isn't the the machinery in any full featured > DNS implementation a "dyanamic DB"? The term "database" should not > imply "sql" or even "relational." Indeed, a DNS server is a type of database server. The DNS is a large distributed database. Regards, Chris _______________________________________________ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
