-----Original Message----- From: Blake Hudson <bl...@ispn.net> Date: Wednesday, November 20, 2013 11:03 AM To: "bind-users@lists.isc.org" <bind-users@lists.isc.org> Subject: Re: RHEL 6 CPU load
>Daniel, what do you see the load as? I see 4.6% CPU usage (100% possible >- 95.4% idle). Wondering the same. Don't consider 0.00 high load. ;-) >I'm not sure which versions of BIND you were using on RHEL5, but the >newer versions do tend to use more CPU usage (I'll assume due to new >features, patches, etc in the BIND code). > >--Blake > >- wrote the following on 11/20/2013 9:37 AM: > >We recently upgraded one of our DNS servers to RHEL 6. The other two >servers are running RHEL 5. The new system is showing much higher CPU >load than the other two (RHEL 5 machines sit around 11-15%). I am not >sure if this is related to the OS versions > or something else. The build procedure for the new system is completely >different than before which could also be the cause. Any ideas why this >could be happening? Were the configure options the same when you built on 5.x vs 6.x? You can see that with named -V. You mention a different build procedure -- do you mean named or OS? As a first step I would focus on those differences. FWIW I have moved about 30 recursive resolvers with the highest iterative workload I've had the privilege of managing to centos 6.x and had no ill effects so I don't think it's simply the OS itself. _______________________________________________ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users