Yes, an IXFR is a series of deletes and adds, which both quote whole records. If you re-sign a zone the IXFR can be nearly twice what an AXFR would be! But in fact the factor of two in my patch comes from the journal compaction logic, which halves the size of the journal. So my patch allows the journal to oscillate between the size of the zone and twice that. Smaller journals may mean you have to AXFR when IXFR would be better.
If you use serial-update-method unixtime or date-based serial numbers then you might be able to get the information you want from the journal. Tony. -- f.anthony.n.finch <d...@dotat.at> http://dotat.at > On 21 Jan 2015, at 18:37, Bob Harold <rharo...@umich.edu> wrote: > > I like that solution. > > I assume that "twice the zone file size" is because half of the entries are > deletes? Do deletes get sent in IXFR? Or is it that typically half of the > journal entries are SOA records? > > I just took a peek at my journal files and I see one that is 100 times the > zone file size. I wish the entries had dates, even if just as a comment - it > would be a good log of changes, and I would be able to see how far back in > history the journal went. > _______________________________________________ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
