Thanks all for your inputs!! On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 4:39 PM, Robert Edmonds <edmo...@mycre.ws> wrote:
> Mukund Sivaraman wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 03, 2015 at 01:50:14PM -0500, Linux Addict wrote: > > > I do dig . +trace and the results seem show .new servers. This is > > > causing SERVFAIL for root query. Any ideas? > > > > > > dig . +trace > > > > Contact the person who runs the resolver at 172.27.254.11 and report the > > problem about the root hints. dig +trace uses the configured resolver to > > only find the root nameservers, and directly does lookups afterwards. > > Also note that there are only two bits different between ascii 't' > (01110100) and ascii 'w' (01110111). Most likely the root cause is > memory corruption somewhere, rather than any sort of intentional or > unintentional misconfiguration. > > See, e.g.: > > http://dinaburg.org/bitsquatting.html > > https://www.verisigninc.com/assets/VRSN_Bitsquatting_TR_20120320.pdf > > > http://mina.naguib.ca/blog/2012/10/22/the-little-ssh-that-sometimes-couldnt.html > > -- > Robert Edmonds > _______________________________________________ > Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to > unsubscribe from this list > > bind-users mailing list > bind-users@lists.isc.org > https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users >
_______________________________________________ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users