On 18.03.2015 13:22, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: >>> On 18.03.15 12:05, Constantin Stefanov wrote: >>>> I can't. It stopped working after upgrade to 9.10, but worked before >>>> with 9.6. And the question is how to keep the config as simple as it was >>>> before upgrade. >>> >>> I mean, the "in-view" definitions... > > On 18.03.15 13:10, Konstantin Stefanov wrote: >> So now I have to have two definitions for every slave zone in different >> files. Well, it is the thing I did, but I do not like it. >> >> Requirement to have 2 synced definitions in 2 different places leads to >> bugs. > > and what did you have before? > multiple definitions of the same zones with the same filenames, which leads > to bugs (although you were lucky not to encounter them) Yes, I was lucky and everything worked for me as I thought it had to be.
> > now you can have: > > definitions of zones with filename in one general view > > file with definitions of zones with "in-view". > > multiple inclusions of the file in multiple views. And now I am unlucky as I have to make my cofig more complex, confusing and bug-prone to achieve the same effect. But I'm lucky enough to have three options to choose how to spoil my config. > >>>>> the only other way is stop using views... > ... you still can stop using views. And I can still stop using DNS. If I only could stop using views, I would not ask the question. -- Konstantin Stefanov, Research Computing Center M.V Lomonosov Moscow State University _______________________________________________ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
