On 12.01.2016 20:29, Tim Daneliuk wrote: > I have two FreeBSD 10 machines on which I have installed the bind99 port. > > The manpage for named on machine 1 says that it looks for the named.conf > by default in /usr/local/etc/namedb. Machine 2's manpage says it looks > in /etc/namedb. > > Which is correct? Is the /etc/namedb symlink even needed anymore? Are they freshly installed FreeBSD 10 or were update to ver 10 from 9 or earlier? In FreeBSD 9 there was in-base named which had config at /et/namedb. Maybe the manpage on one of the machines is from earlier versions? Try man -a named.conf and see if there are other vresions of man page.
By default bind99 port uses /usr/local/etc/namedb, but it used to have REPLACE_BASE option, which instructed it to use /etc/namedb, so you may check it. -- Konstantin Stefanov, Research Computing Center M.V Lomonosov Moscow State University _______________________________________________ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
