On 2016-01-29 18:45, Grant Taylor wrote:
On 01/26/2016 04:46 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
violating what?
Chaining CNAMEs is a violation according to RFCs.
It works, but it is unsupported, and you can only blame yourself when
it doesn't.
Maybe I'm misremembering RFC 1034, but a CNAME chain only violates a
"should", and later in that RFC it says that software "should not" fail
to handle chains, so even if you take a "should" as gospel, the "should
not" should be equally gospel, making CNAME chains supported (although
not advised.)
--
Dave Warren
http://www.hireahit.com/
http://ca.linkedin.com/in/davejwarren
_______________________________________________
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
from this list
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
