From: Matthew Pounsett <m...@conundrum.com> > I fully support breaking resolution for such servers. I'd rather > have a hard failure on my end that I can investigate, and work > around if necessary, than have my server wasting cycles trying to > guess what sort of broken state there is on the far end. It would > also give me the heads up I need to contact the admin on the far end > and report their servers' broken behaviour.
And the remote admin would say "Well, it must be your problem because no one else is complaining." I get the same line of BS when I refuse to honor a whitelisted domain in my spam filter if they fail SPF checks. Not many filters do that, but I think it is a great idea. People dread hearing from the IRS, but they can't afford to block the emails. Confidentiality Notice: This electronic message and any attachments may contain confidential or privileged information, and is intended only for the individual or entity identified above as the addressee. If you are not the addressee (or the employee or agent responsible to deliver it to the addressee), or if this message has been addressed to you in error, you are hereby notified that you may not copy, forward, disclose or use any part of this message or any attachments. Please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail or telephone and delete this message from your system. _______________________________________________ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
