In article <[email protected]>, "Darcy Kevin (FCA)" <[email protected]> wrote:
> It should be noted that answering from cache, e.g. when a server gets an RD=0 > query, or if it doesn't happen to honor recursion for that particular client, > was originally (perhaps naively) unrestricted, but, given evolving > privacy/security concerns, is now restricted by default, in all (or almost > all) implementations. For BIND, it's controlled by allow-query-cache. It also makes sense from a technical perspective -- why should the result of a query depend on coincidences of history of the server? Cache is meant for performance improvement, but it shouldn't affect the semantics. -- Barry Margolin Arlington, MA _______________________________________________ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list bind-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
