The subject is a little off, I have a Class B network masked down to a bunch of 
Class C networks.

I am replacing an old DNS service where they configured it as one might expect 
with one reverse mapping file per network.  So we have many of these files.

I don't see any reason why I can't treat my reverse mapping file as if it were 
all Class B addresses.  So one big reverse mapping  file just like my forward 
mapping file.  This would make management of the reverse mapping file much 
easier.

This is a smallish internal network, about 900 hosts or so.  We're doing no 
delegation.

So my question is, is there a good reason why I should not do this?  It's been 
awhile since I had a DNS project and have never managed it on a Class B with 
Class C masked networks before.

Thanks,
Rick

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Rick Reineman
IDT Engineering, San Jose, Ca.
Senior UNIX Administrator


_______________________________________________
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe 
from this list

bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users

Reply via email to