Am 08.02.2018 um 17:03 schrieb Barry Margolin:
In article <mailman.427.1518103401.749.bind-us...@lists.isc.org>,
Reindl Harald <h.rei...@thelounge.net> wrote:
frankly, even *if* i pay for the service i would call it a good citizen
to produce less load and the "minimum-ttl" also reduces load from other
RBL's without any restriction
If the service provider is worried about load, they should increase
their TTL to reduce the frequency of queries. It's not your job to
second-guess them.
let my job me my own problem - seriously - my server - my rules - period
if named can't serve my needs than "dnf remove bind; dnf install
unbound" is the solution and was it on mailservers
named is great as authoritative server but not for RBL's which also can
be used on webserver (web-application firewall where you try to reduce
latency as much as you can)
_______________________________________________
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
from this list
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
