On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 3:42 PM, SIMON BABY <simonkb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello Evan,
> Thank you so much for the quick response.
> My requirement is to implement only the recursive resolve and validation
> part of the DNSSEC in my client application. Our CPU and memory are very
> limited. So I am not sure I can go and use BIND 9.
I get that this is bind-users, but have you looked at https://getdnsapi.net/ ?
> With BIND 9, can I integrate the library in my application to send queries
> and validate the answer in my client code itself. Can you please point if
> any sample code.
> On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 12:26 PM, Evan Hunt <e...@isc.org> wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 12:08:18PM -0800, SIMON BABY wrote:
>> > I am trying to implement the full recursive resolver with libbind
>> > library
>> > in my client code. I am not using resolv.conf in my implementation. Can
>> > anyone please help to point any sample code for this.
>> Not even BIND uses libbind anymore.
>> What's the purpose of this? Why not just use BIND 9, or some other
>> existing resolver?
>> Evan Hunt -- e...@isc.org
>> Internet Systems Consortium, Inc.
> Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to
> unsubscribe from this list
> bind-users mailing list
I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad
idea in the first place.
This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing
regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
from this list
bind-users mailing list