Will the performance be same, considering the number of zones I have or will have??
On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 12:16 AM, Grant Taylor via bind-users < bind-users@lists.isc.org> wrote: > On 04/18/2018 11:52 AM, Blason R wrote: > >> Pertaining to my other thread since I am building sinkhole server which >> will eventually have around 0.5 million zones or may be 1 Million which one >> would you think will perform better? >> >> RPZ or include statements? I have 8 Core Processor and 32 GB of RAM >> > > Which holds more watter; a banana or a hammer? > > An RPZ is a specail type of zone and include statements are ways to create > a zone from multiple files. > > You can easily have your RPZ zone file include contents from other files. > > I suspect you are meaning to ask, which performs better, a single RPZ > covering LOTS of domains, or multiple discreet zones with each covering one > domain (including sub-domains). — I suspect that RPZ will win in that I > expect it will require fewer resources. I say this because a single RPZ > can have records that impact multiple domains in the single zone file, > compared to needing multiple zones (and files) using the traditional > non-RPZ method. > > > > -- > Grant. . . . > unix || die > > > _______________________________________________ > Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to > unsubscribe from this list > > bind-users mailing list > bind-users@lists.isc.org > https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users > >
_______________________________________________ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users