You could setup a DNSMASQ / Unbound service as a front end, which then queried 
bind. Both of those allow the setting of a minimum TTL (max of 3600 seconds in 
DNSMASQ). It cannot be done with bind by itself.

> On Oct 26, 2018, at 11:41, Grant Taylor via bind-users 
> <bind-users@lists.isc.org> wrote:
> 
> On 10/26/2018 01:23 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
>> there is not.
> 
> Thank you, Matus and Tony, for the direct answer.
> 
>> using short TTLs is very risky, and forcing minimum TTL is apparently not 
>> way to work around.
> 
> Understood.  -  I /think/ that I'm somewhat (dangerously?) informed and 
> /choosing/ my own poison.  Maybe.
> 
> To be clear, I'm not wanting to artificially lower the TTL.  I want to 
> respect any and all TTLs that are longer than my locally administered minimum.
> 
> My motivation for setting the minimum TTL (while fully accepting any and all 
> risk and associated responsibility there for) is to thwart DNS Rebinding.  Or 
> to at least make it much more difficult (as in longer than my artificial 
> minimum TTL) to do.
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Grant. . . .
> unix || die
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe 
> from this list
> 
> bind-users mailing list
> bind-users@lists.isc.org
> https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users

_______________________________________________
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe 
from this list

bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users

Reply via email to