On Fri, Dec 7, 2018 at 5:19 AM Ralph Seichter <m16+b...@monksofcool.net> wrote:
> * Jakob Dhondt: > > > I have just noticed that when using dig (different versions) on Mac OS > > (High Sierra) over IPv6 the source port is not randomized. Hmmm. I’d never noticed that, but I certainly wouldn’t have expected it - I’m also wondering *how* it is doing this — to increment by 2 it sounds like there is state being kept - perhaps dig simply relies on the kernel for the source port and isn’t randomizing at all ( and so the difference is actually OS difference, and not dig differences? > > I may be having a senior moment, but don't IPv6 privacy extensions cover > address randomization rather than port randomization? > Yes, but this has nothing to do with v6 privacy addresses - they are orthogonal... W > -Ralph > _______________________________________________ > Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to > unsubscribe from this list > > bind-users mailing list > bind-users@lists.isc.org > https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users > -- I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad idea in the first place. This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair of pants. ---maf
_______________________________________________ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
