On Dec 20 2018, Marc Richter wrote:
When checking the BIND XML statistics I see the following in the "Cache DB
RRsets" section, which I think
could be the reason for the high memory usage:
!AAAA 18446744073709551559
!A6 18446744073709551607
Is this an overflow on the counter for these negative responses in Cache, or
could there really be that many objects in the cache ?
Assuming these were output as uint64_t but then reinterpreting them as
int64_t, they are very *small* negative numbers, -57 and -9 respectively.
I suspect something other than overflow is responsible.
--
Chris Thompson
Email: c...@cam.ac.uk
_______________________________________________
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
from this list
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
