On 09.08.21 13:55, Klaus Darilion via bind-users wrote:
>But honestly SVCB will not solve the ANAME problem. I will take years
> until all resolvers/client would support SVCB whereas ANAME would be
> implemented in the authoritative name server
resolving on authoritative server could in fact help, and wouldn't need
protocol
change at all, but the problem above is crucial (what would you do in case
of failure? refuse whole zone?)
On 09.08.21 14:37, Klaus Darilion via bind-users wrote:
Resolving is done when there is an incoming query, not on zone loading. So
if the auth's resolver (either a full blown resolver or a stub resolver
which forwards to another resolver) fails to resolve I would just forward
this error to the client's resolver.
This would not change the fact that you are asking authoritative server to
resolve record which is by definition not the job of authoritative server.
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
I intend to live forever - so far so good.
_______________________________________________
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
from this list
ISC funds the development of this software with paid support subscriptions.
Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact/ for more information.
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
