On Fri, Oct 22, 2021 at 9:57 AM Dan Hanks <danha...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Greetings, > > As I understand RFC 2308, when receiving an NXDOMAIN response, and when > deciding how long to cache that NXDOMAIN response, a resolver should use > whichever value is lower of the SOA TTL, and the SOA.minimum value as the > length of time to cache the NXDOMAIN.
I've done a more careful reading of the text in RFC2308. It states, "Name servers authoritative for a zone MUST include the SOA record of the zone in the authority section of the response when reporting an NXDOMAIN or indicating that no data of the requested type exists. This is required so that the response may be cached. ***The TTL of this record is set from the minimum of the MINIMUM field of the SOA record and the TTL of the SOA itself***, and indicates how long a resolver may cache the negative answer. The TTL SIG record associated with the SOA record should also be trimmed in line with the SOA's TTL." (emphasis added) I interpret this to mean that an authoritative resolver should set the TTL on the SOA record included in the AUTHORITY section of an NXDOMAIN response to be the minimum of the zone SOA TTL, and the SOA.minimum field. It does not look like Route53 is doing this. I am guessing that BIND is interpreting RFC2308 this way as well, and using the TTL value of the SOA record in the nxdomain response to determine how long to cache the nxdomain response. Can anybody confirm this? Thanks, Dan _______________________________________________ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list ISC funds the development of this software with paid support subscriptions. Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact/ for more information. bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
