I have to warn you:
Authoritative server selection in DNS is not standardized, and thus it is not guaranteed to be stable even between BIND releases.

If you need to make static and/or optimal routing then you need to reach into IP routing layer for that.

Petr Špaček



On 08. 05. 22 18:57, Ben Croswell wrote:
On the closest server question it will prefer the closest but a certain percentage will go to servers further away. Additionally depending on the version of BIND and the distance it could lead to the servers further away taking more traffic in high QPS situations.

If you are getting high QPS you could fire off a large amount of queries to the "slower" server before it responds and resets its SRTT. I believe newer BIND versions have moved away from a static decrement value and has fixed the issue but even fixes some queries will go out of region.


On Sun, May 8, 2022, 12:47 PM Bob McDonald <bmcdonal...@gmail.com <mailto:bmcdonal...@gmail.com>> wrote:

    Thanks for the answers. A couple more questions and then I'll
    stand down.

    First, it's Ben Croswell. Just pointing that out.

    Second, my reading of the definition of a static-stub zone in the
    Bvarmindicates that its use is to allow a local copy of the NS list
    which may differ from the primary zone. I'm not sure that's what I'm
    looking for. I think I'm ok with the NS list from the primary zone.
    Lei me take another swing and try to be a bit more pedantic to see
    if that helps.

    I wish to define a global internal DNS environment.

    At the level closest to the client would be a global network of
    recursive DNS servers which would handle all internal and external
    DNS requests. The internal DNS zones would be housed on a
    global network of authoritative only DNS servers. The NS list for
    the internal DNS zones on these authoritative only servers would be
    known to the recursive servers via stub zones. My question is, if a
    client in Mumbai submits a DNS request to his local recursive server
    for an internal authoritative only zone defined by a stub zone
    statement, which authoritative only server does the recursive server
    pick from the NS list and will that eventually be the "closest"
    server. I'm assuming a global distribution of the authoritative
    servers. E.g. Hong Kong, London, US East, US West, South Amer, etc.
    The use of the stub zones in this case is to eliminate the need for
    an internal root. I want to avoid lookups for example from clients
    in Asia being sent to authoritative only servers in South Amer.

    Bob
--
Visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from 
this list

ISC funds the development of this software with paid support subscriptions. 
Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact/ for more information.


bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users

Reply via email to