On 5/11/22 11:24 AM, Bob McDonald wrote:
It would seem that using an anycast cloud name (An anycast cloud of the NS device IPs) for the MNAME might provide the same level of distribution as per Windows. However, again, you run into the issues of forwarded updates.
Another thing that I've seen discussed -- but haven't tested myself -- is to play tricks like having the MNAME be it's own zone hosted on each DNS server wherein the zone resolves the MNAME to the local DNS server.
This seems like a varient on anycasting, which operates on the IP layer. Except this provides similar functionality at the DNS application layer.
You could probably achieve similar results with an RPZ overriding the MNAME with the local server's IP address.
}:-) -- Grant. . . . unix || die
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
-- Visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list ISC funds the development of this software with paid support subscriptions. Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact/ for more information. bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
